Redefining The Word 'Talent'
What if we defined talent differently in
sports? What if instead of using the standard definition of talent, which is
traditionally based on the physical abilities of an athlete we start giving
weightage to the ‘mental’ strength of the individual? How would this new
definition change the way we look at sportspersons? Let’s try it on for size.
If we are adding an individual’s ‘mental’
abilities to the definition of talent we probably need to define what we mean
by ‘mental’ abilities?
Is it the ability to perform under moments
of pressure? Yes. That definitely is a factor. Hitting sixes and boundaries in
the last over of a match, raising your game when it is 4-4 in the fifth set of
a tennis match and of course lining up to kick a penalty. This mental ability
to perform when it counts the most, is a skill and talent that only the best in
the business have had over the years.

A number of players and coaches have said
in the past that so often you prepare for an opponent with in-depth strategy
and plans and quite often within 5 minutes of the contest beginning your entire
game plan and strategy goes out of the window and adjustments have to be made.
This ‘mental’ ability and skill in a contest is critical at the highest level
of sport.
The final mental ability is the ability to
change your game as you prepare and execute these changes when it counts. There
probably is no finer example of this than Sachin Tendulkar’s 241 vs. Australia
in Sydney in 2004. Struggling with form, Sachin displayed a mental ability that
defied every aspect of his natural game, in what was probably one of his
greatest innings. He chose not to drive the ball, altered his game plan and
executed it with perfection.
If we add these aspects to the definition
of ‘talent’ then can we ask ourselves the difficult and somewhat uneasy
question- which Indian Batsmen, with the exception of Virat Kohli, is even
remotely talented?
Based on the recently concluded test? None.
While the match may have been exciting in
terms of swings of ups and downs from both sides the brutal lesson from the
contest was that the Indian batsmen continue to show that they have zero mental
talent as defined above. The two areas where they showed a complete lack were
points 2 and 3.

KL Rahul- obviously still feels it is
summer in India and has not realized it is summer in England. The IPL is over.
Ajinkya Rahane- if I have to hear any of
the panelists say one more time about how he is too good a player to stay out
of form for so long, I may lose my mind
Sunil Gavaskar is up in arms about the fact
that the players took five days off at a stretch and I agree completely. This
was about mental preparation and by the looks of it there wasn’t any. When the
teams ‘mental’ talent is sub-par, so much time off is blasphemous.
Virat Kohli has insisted that the team be
at a certain level of fitness and that’s great. A lot of the players even have
the physical ‘talent’ in terms of having a lot of shots. But if the ‘mental’
talent of the batsmen remains where it was in the first test match, then the
team doesn’t deserve the world number one ranking by any standard.
Let's just hope the Indian team's 'mental' talent gets developed and shines in the remaining tests.
photo credits.
https://www.si.com/specials/100-greatest/?q=14-the-rumble-in-the-jungle
http://www.espncricinfo.com/sri-lanka-v-india-2015/content/story/910365.html
Comments
Post a Comment